Like all good citizens of WhiteManistan, Ted Nugent just can’t figure out why African-Americans don’t love him (or them). And hate Barack Obama, the Hitler Commie. That is because it is obvious that it’s the President who is the sworn enemy of black America. Kind of like when Glenn Beck was always trying to get people to buy he was just like MLK.
The destruction of blacks has been engineered by President Obama’s party for at least the last 50 years. The New Deal was a raw deal, and The Great Society experiment didn’t turn out to be so great after all. It has been an unmitigated disaster for black Americans …
The truth is that the Democratic Party has been the engineer of the destruction of black Americans, and everyone knows it except the very people who need to know it the most – black Americans.
The turbo-destruction will continue for black Americans until they realize that dirty Democrat politicians are their true enemy …
I don’t celebrate Black History Month. I celebrate it every day, as my very black-inspired musical dreams …
There is no doubt that my 2013 tour will be the best of my life. With world-class virtuosos paying tribute to our black heroes nightly, it is only fitting that this year’s tour is aptly titled, “Ted Nugent Black Power 2013.??? Say it loud: my music is black and I’m proud!
Practically speaking, Nugent has been singing this embarrassing tune for years, mostly in an unsuccessful effort to combat the image that he’s a bigot.
It’s truly the stuff of genius, blandishments so ridiculous as to reduce one to tetany. And in the face of continuing derision, like all good people of WhiteManistan, Ted just turns up the volume on the stupid.
Yep, he’s certainly very black.
John Sinclair, manager of the MC5, and one of the original “stinky hippies,??? according to Nugent, describing the scene around the Grande Ballroom in Detroit in the Sixties:
JOHN SINCLAIR: That’s what it was like back then … everybody smoked, nobody snitched, everyone was cool — except for Ted Nugent. He was not cool, always an asshole, everybody hated him (laughs).
The equivalent of an Internet troll posting, Reuters polled a whole “1,443 Americans over the age of 18,” coming up with the statistic that a majority — about 53 percent of the citizenry wants illegals deported.
Not where I’m from. And cleaving to that stupid notion resulted in the destruction of the GOP in the state.
The piece, here, has John McCain trying to explain things to his WhiteManistan constituency in Arizona:
Republican Senator John McCain, one of the eight senators in the group, had his own encounter with citizens angered by illegal immigration on Tuesday when residents of his state of Arizona complained bitterly at a town hall meeting about the lack of security on the border with Mexico.
One man asked why troops had not been deployed to the border.
“Why didn’t the army go down there and stop them? Because the only thing that stops them I’m afraid to say, and it’s too damn bad, is a gun,” the man said.
Another resident, Keith Smith, got into a testy exchange with McCain, the 2008 Republican presidential candidate whose views on immigration have fluctuated over the years.
“Cut off their welfare and all their stuff and they’ll go back,” Smith said, referring to undocumented workers.
McCain had been trying to explain his position: “You’re not telling these people the truth. They mow our lawns, they care for our babies, they clean … that’s what those people do,” he said.
They pick the fruit and vegetables in the fields here, are the gardeners, the janitors, the house cleaners, and they’re not on welfare.
Why can’t they send “the troops” to the border? Get the guns, Homer! Zeb Colter for President, 2016! This isn’t the land of debris, it’s the land of the free, dammit!
And anyone here think WhiteManistan is too harsh a mock?
“Celebrate freedom and common sense by purchasing more guns and ammo, and give away NRA memberships to everyone you know … The beauty of President Obama’s violence task force headed up by VP Biden … is that Americans are now better armed than any society in the history of mankind. That’s what freedom addicts do. When our government even hints that they are going to ban something, Americans rush out and cause the sales of that product to skyrocket. AR-15s and other mis-identified ‘assault weapons’ are virtually sold out.”
He’s all heart. If smallpox could be a person, it would choose to be Ted.
Meanwhile, President Obama is leading this country to financial ruin, borrowing over a trillion dollars a year for phony “stimulus??? spending and other payoffs for his political cronies. Nobody knows if or when the fiscal collapse will come, but if the country is broke, there likely won’t be enough money to pay for police protection. And the American people know it.
The media try to make rank-and-file Americans feel guilty about buying a gun. The enemies of freedom demonize gun buyers and portray us as social lepers.
We are the largest civil rights organization in the world, and we have been part of the fabric of America ever since 1871.
We will not surrender. We will not appease. We will buy more guns than ever.
The President took a few moments in last night’s State of the Union to address infrastructure and cybersecurity. It was the usual shoeshine, assertions that something terrible will happen if steps aren’t taken, allegations of a looming menace that means nothing when stacked up against major economic issues.
The mythology of cyberattacks turning off the power, poisoning the water, and — most laughably — attacking the financial system (ie, Wall Street) have been piled so deeply over such a long time, a substantial number of people now believe them.
President Barack Obama on Tuesday signed the long-awaited executive order designed to enhance the security posture of the nation’s critical cyber infrastructure. Obama made the announcement during the State of the Union address.
“America must also face the rapidly growing threat from cyber-attacks,” Obama stated. “We know hackers steal people’s identities and infiltrate private email. We know foreign countries and companies swipe our corporate secrets. Now our enemies are also seeking the ability to sabotage our power grid, our financial institutions, and our air traffic control systems. We cannot look back years from now and wonder why we did nothing in the face of real threats to our security and our economy.”
The new executive order, however, does not have the force of law. And some analysts see it simply as the latest attempt by the administration to increase pressure on Congress to pass meaningful cybersecurity legislation.
“The administration has been building up to issuing an executive order on this for months,” said George Smith, a senior fellow at Globalsecurity.org. “And, no, it won’t have any impact on infrastructure cybersecurity. None of the Obama administration’s executive orders, in anything for that matter, have any teeth or any practical consequence. They’re essentially blandishments and suggestions that are ignored or meant for window dressing. It’s an attempt to shape the debate and push legislation.”
And that’s exactly how Obama left the issue in his State of the Union speech.
Pabulum.
The country would be better served by the President helping to reduce the power of the minority culture of gun nuts with real steps in new law and control. At the end, that was easily the most powerful part of his speech.
[The] cable news networks have, so far, maintained a near-blockade on Nugent clips, and according to Bill Press, wasn’t featured in any of the crowd shots from the speech. The only exceptions, so far, have been CNN and MSNBC, who each aired Nugent snippets during the 5 am hour Wednesday morning, one of which, naturally, contained the word “fecal.???
It wasn’t as if Nugent didn’t make himself available, either. Politico (Oh no! They couldn’t resist either!!) reported that Nugent held court with reporters, telling them that Rep. Jim Langevin (D-RI), who was paralyzed in a shooting accident, had “Shit for brains??? because he was critical of Nugent’s attendance at the address. He also denied threatening President Obama.
NBC News’ Luke Russert later asked Nugent if he thought that was “an appropriate thing to say about a sitting member of Congress who’s in a wheelchair????
You can’t satirize America. Not even with fictitious grindhouse movie posters. (Which rule and you should recommend to others.)
What to do with the profane man who was visited by the US Secret Service last year under suspicion of making threats against the president or inspiring others to do so, who has called the president a coyote in the living room that needs taking care of, who has called the president a communist in need of fixing?
Invite him to the State of the Union address as your guest in good standing with the neo-fascist party.
From the wire:
On Tuesday, Nugent will attend Obama’s State of the Union address as a guest of Republican Texas Rep. Steve Stockman …
“I am excited to have a patriot like Ted Nugent joining me in the House Chamber to hear from President Obama,??? Stockman said in a statement. “After the address I’m sure Ted will have plenty to say.???
Having plenty to say is what got The Nuge in hot water in April 2012 at a National Rifle Association convention. His controversial comments even rated the outspoken gun-rights advocate a visit from the Secret Service.
They have no common decency, amply demonstrating it time after time.
Ted Nugent appears to have failed out of the opinion pages of the Washington Times, replacing it with an identical column at the conspiracy and birther news site, WorldNetDaily. It is difficult to imagine being too insane and right-wing for the Washington Times. After all, writing the same thing over and over about the president being a Chicago-style gangster, a fan of Mao Tse-Tung and someone using the “Saul Alinsky playbook” to dismantle America never gets old with the fan base. Or perhaps Times editors noticed Ted was giving banner interviews, identical to his his columns for them, for a competitor, WND.
So this week at WND, Nugent delivers another interview with the same old stuff, including his new vehement assertion: The president is a commie who appoints commies!
Who uses the word ‘commie’ now? Anyone, besides white people over sixty? Do young people even know what ‘commies’ were or where they lived?
If there’s anything that paints one as an old fool, it’s probably ranting about ‘commies’ in 2013.
“Then when you scrutinize the self-evident truth of God-given individual rights, the Founding Fathers wrote it down, not because they got together and had a good idea. They knew that the king denied these self-evident truths and these God-given individual rights.
“So we wrote down the self-evident, truth-based, God-given rights that we the people in this new land, free of kings, free of emperors, free of tyrants, free of slave drivers, that we will exercise our God-given, instinctual, self-evident, truth-based right to self-defense from any evil force that threatens our gift of life from God and especially power-abusing monsters in government.???
Nugent said he also doesn’t buy President Obama’s claim that he’s proposing “common-sense??? gun restrictions or Obama’s claim that he is a great respecter of the Second Amendment.
“I say sure you are, Mr. President, and I’m a gay pirate,??? mused Nugent. “One just has to study Barack Obama’s voting record.
“The commander in chief will go to the Vietnam Memorial Wall and will put on his community organizer, ACORN, Van Jones, gangland, Chicago, gangster-politic scam best and pretend to show respect for 58,000 heroic American military warriors who gave the ultimate sacrifice fighting communism. And then President Obama will go back and appoint members of the Communist Party as his czars.
“He will continue to associate [with] communists, publicly admitted communists after visiting the Vietnam Memorial Wall.
Ted Nugent did not fight in the Vietnam War. ACORN no longer exists, although many Tea Party types when polled after the November election evinced belief it had been the cause of the president’s victory. And many of the Founding Fathers, whose work Nugent loves to cite, were slave-owners.
Which a lot of people who’ve had high school history and remember it know.
In a side note, Ted Nugent is emblematic of why the Republican Party was rejected by voters in November. It became a party that thinks exactly like him, if — on occasion, and only on occasion — more politely.
Having not appeared in the leading newspaper of crazy, the Washington Times, for almost a month, Ted Nugent may have failed down to the right wing news and conspiracy website, WND.
Today, World Net Daily announced a new Nugent column, the Ted Offensive. And only Ted Nugent could be stupid enough to attempt to cop the name of the North Vietnam offensive launched on January 30, 1968, one that informed the United States it would lose in Vietnam.
Ted Nugent, coincidentally, did not serve in Vietnam. But he was not a a simple draft dodger as many assume. His selective service classification indicates he was given a deferment for community college and a later one for an unspecified problem that made him unfit for duty.
But back to the Ted Offensive.
Unsurprisingly, it’s lousy, more of the unconsciously horrendous publicity the right is so good at — screeds that convince everyone not in the tribe that the GOP, the National Rifle Association, Ted Nugent — are insane.
What Sen. Feinstein, VP Biden or President Obama want is more control over Americans. These socialists and Marxists don’t care about mass murder. What they are want is more control, their boots on our necks …
Gun banners will go after handguns next. Liberal propaganda ministers will beat the drum that handguns are more evil than so-called assault weapons, that handguns are only good for killing other human beings.
Banning guns is the means to an end. The end is control, not freedom. They know that they can do whatever they so choose to a disarmed America.
It’s a plot.
The Obama administration and the liberals will end freedom in America, using the methods of a harmless dead man, Saul Alinsky, an obscure dead man who wrote a book Glenn Beck once told his audience would be the blueprint for destroying freedom and old WhiteManistan Ted Nugent’s America of pink tiger-striped AR-15s.
Despite now notorious repeat appearances on CNN (they keep having him on because he’s a cartoon of a ranting bad man) and network television, the last twelve months have not been kind to Nugent.
The National Journal has published a deep piece on the obsolescence of the “Reagan Democrat.” More precisely, it discusses the hardening reality in which the Democratic Party doesn’t need to rely on white conservative voters to win the White House anymore if it continues to strengthen its progressive multi-cultural and younger coalition.
With the GOP and the times, white conservative voters turned inward into a tribe of neo-fascists susceptible to mass paranoia, easily motivated to hatred of everything and everyone not exactly like them.
On issues from gay rights to gun control, immigration reform, and climate change—all of which he highlighted in his ringing Inaugural Address last week—Obama is now unreservedly articulating the preferences of the Democratic “coalition of the ascendant??? centered on minorities, the millennial generation, and socially liberal upscale whites, especially women. Across all of these issues, and many others such as the pace of withdrawal from Afghanistan and ending the ban on women in combat, Obama is displaying much less concern than most national Democratic leaders since the 1960s about antagonizing culturally conservative blue-collar, older, and rural whites, many of whom oppose them …
[The] ongoing racial and ideological sorting of the electorate has rapidly reduced the Democrats’ dependence on those voters. In 2012, Obama lost more than three-fifths of noncollege whites and whites older than 45; he carried only one-third of noncollege white men, the worst performance of any Democratic nominee since Walter Mondale was buried in Ronald Reagan’s 1984 landslide. Yet Obama nonetheless won a solid victory by posting strong numbers with minorities (a combined 80 percent), the millennials (60 percent), and college-educated white women (46 percent overall and more in many key states); moreover, each of those groups expanded its share of the total vote. (For the first time, white women with college degrees cast more votes last year than white men without them.)
Similarly, Democrats last November regained House seats in districts that are more racially diverse than the national average, while continuing to suffer losses in those more heavily white: After 2012, Democrats hold just 31 of the 143 districts in which whites constitute at least 80 percent of the population.
In the Senate, the Democratic majority still relies on a significant number of members from states that lean Republican in presidential politics. But, overall, the pattern of the party’s presidential and congressional support in 2012 largely fulfilled the dreams of liberal strategists from the early 1970s, who believed Democrats could build a more ideologically forceful party if they reduced their reliance on conservative whites. As Richard Nixon’s landslide defeat of George McGovern in 1972 demonstrated, a coalition of minorities, young people, and socially liberal upscale whites was far from a majority. Four decades later, amid the headwind of a grueling recovery from the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression, Obama emphatically proved the opposite. The result is that the president, to a striking extent, appears unshackled from the fear of alienating conservative white voters …
