05.02.10

Biblical Fail

Posted in Stumble and Fail, Why the World Doesn't Need US at 8:32 am by George Smith


Quote from website: Good news, lads! Good news! … Thanks to you today I work for Halliburton, a company which is perfectly inline with my values.

Pssst, I added the “Good news, lads!” bit. The rest is real, though.

This blog deals with a sizeable number of montebanks in the national security business who regularly predict attacks by American enemies which result in catastrophes of Biblical proportion.

And then there are real world Biblical catastrophes which have no relationship with the fictions the former like to peddle.

It’s a symbol of systemic US dysfunction at almost every level, from simple comprehension and critical thinking about subjects to the national leadership which has made all the wrong decisions, seeing fit to cede all authority and regulation to corporate power.

When the best one can come up with are containment booms and silly talk about chemical dispersant, as if the latter is some magic wand which can be applied to an oil slick, we know the holster’s empty and the gun jammed.

Quotes:

At a town hall meeting in Bayou La Batre, Alabama, Mayor Stan Wright warned fishermen in the audience that outbursts would be met with arrest. The fishermen were told that they were not allowed to ask questions.

Stifle your questions and anger. Don’t demand BP bosses be lynched. What fine leadership qualities this shows.

Crews worked through Friday night to dispense 3,000 gallons of sub-surface dispersant, officials said.

About 1.6 million gallons of oil have spilled since the explosion, the Coast Guard said.

Since journalists have no idea about simple chemistry and mass action, they have only an inkling of how pathetic this reads.

And the President — who probably thought he was doing something clever by latching onto the Republican position on drilling — is now inconveniently seen as being on the wrong side with the rest of the rascals.

05.01.10

Cult of Cyberwar: When in doubt, make stuff up

Posted in Crazy Weapons, Cyberterrorism, Extremism at 2:50 pm by George Smith

As an appendix to today’s earlier Cult of Cyberwar piece, DD brings you an editorial writer at a Dallas newspaper who can’t help but conflate it with electromagnetic pulse doom, or the Cult of EMP Crazy. After recommending Richard Clarke, he goes on an electromagnetic pulse weapon jag.

It’s not uncommon but always surprising to see what rubbish people will publish, just for the sake of convincing you that something very dangerous out there is about to hurl us back to the Stone Age.

[Forget about BP’s oil spill, dangit, that’s just nothing compared to EMP and cyberwar.]

Opines an editor at the Dallas Morning News:

[Retired Lt. Gen. Harry Raduege Jr.] spent most of his 35-year military career studying the effects of electromagnetic pulses. The good news, he said, is that the fiber-optic cable that makes up much of our ground-based communication network would survive an EMP attack. But anything that uses micro-circuitry would be “tremendously impacted,” he explained; the pulse would “literally fry” such components.

A single electromagnetic pulse weapon, he says, “can kill electronic systems in an area the size of a tennis court or throughout the entire United States.”

We know this because our country has developed and tested such weapons, clearly with plans to deploy them in the event of war against another technologically advanced country. But it would be naive to think we’re the only ones with this weaponry.

More chilling is the fact that an electromagnetic pulse bomb would be relatively easy for terrorists to build and deploy. In 2001, Popular Mechanics magazine described an electromagnetic-pulse bomb that it said could be built for $400 and would be capable of sending out a pulse that “makes a lightning bolt seem like a flashbulb by comparison.” It wouldn’t harm humans but would fry all the microcircuits we rely on, including in our cars. Imagine real disaster scenes like those depicted in ABC’s hit show Flash Forward.

Over the last decade, a constant feature in talks on notional electromagnetic pulse bombs and/or rays is that they can do just about anything. In this case, a single weapon could fry electronics in a tennis court, or in the entire nation. And they’re so easy to make anyone can have them for a paltry few hundred dollars.

For instance, from Congressional testimony ten years ago:

During [a] June [Congressional] hearing, [retired Army general Robert Schweitzer] made seemingly contradictory claims during the course of his presentation. At different times, Schweitzer claimed that electromagnetic pulse guns could be made for $800, that they could be made for $35, that they had been used against London banks although he was informed this was a hoax, and such weapons were now capable of disrupting Wall Street.

??? . . . the cost is about $800 to do this,??? Schweitzer said at one point.

As for knocking out Wall Street, Schweitzer later commented to Congressman Saxton, “[It] can be done with going to RadioShack and buying the components . . . And the prices are from $35 to $200 to buy components and do a number on Wall Street.??? Schweitzer also alluded to, but did not mention by name, a generic hacker tech catalog that claimed to sell parts and schematics for such a weapon.

Further, Schweitzer testified that London banks were attacked by radio-frequency weapons, a myth that has been touched on in Crypt Newsletter.

“I was told that was a hoax,??? Schweitzer said to Saxton. “. . . and it’s disputed in the Intel community and elsewhere but I think, frankly, and having gone into this in great detail, the dispute is to protect the fact it happened.???

Schweitzer added later: “I validated [this]. It isn’t just taking rumors or drivel off of the tabloids. These are solid facts that I’m giving you.???

As a matter of fact, it was rumors and drivel. And Schweitzer died a few years later, never having seen his electromagnetic pulse weapons.

And from April of last year, on the old blog:

The second category of crazy associated with electromagnetic pulse doom lobby is filled with ‘experts’ who believe electromagnetic pulse weapons can be easily made from stuff cadged at Radio Shack. (Well, not quite, but for the sake of this post, the demographic extends into this domain of consumer electronic store junk.)

“Electromagnetic pulse weapons capable of frying the electronics in civil airliners can be built using information and components available on the net, warn counterterrorism analysts,” reads a very recent piece of EMP crazy emission at the New Scientist. (If you saw it originally, readers will note the other ‘most read’ story on the site — how masturbation might protect one from hay fever, certainly puts the entire matter in proper perspective.)

Written for decades — the original electromagnetic pulse gun stories date from at least as early as 1994 — this flavor always has one thing of note: EMP rayguns are easy to make from plans found on the web and materials available in every town.

The New Scientist story obfuscates this cliche only slightly. Instead of using the word ‘easy,’ practical synonyms are employed.

“[An ‘expert’] told delegates at the annual Directed Energy Weapons conference in London last month that … basic EMP generators can be built from descriptions available online, using components found in devices such as digital cameras,” reads New Scientist. “These are technologically unchallenging to build and most of the information necessary is available,” she said.

And DD wrote a syndicated news piece from just before the war, from which I will now draw:

“Talk of the secret electromagnetic pulse bomb was mythology as news, taking on a uniquely American demented quality,” wrote Crypt News in a syndicated feature published around the beginning of the second war in Iraq, the one we’re still in.

“No other single weapon — real or imagined — rivaled its power for sensation. In fact, in a nation where photographs of all weapons, no matter how trivial, are either officially distributed by the Department of Defense or leaked to the public, it was simply astonishing that absolutely none existed of the e-bomb.

“Bubbling over with excitement at something they’d never seen, the media mused openly on a wondrous capacity to destroy the Iraqi military without harming people. How the bomb would stop soldiers with old-fashioned artillery, automatic weapons, or tanks was nowhere to be seen. And guerrilla warfare was completely off the radar.

“Instead, the U.S. media furnished hyperventilated comment on the wonder bomb, exclamations suitable for Hollywood script.

“‘ Kabammy! A huge electronic wave comes along and sends out a few thousand volts,” blared one newspaper. ‘. . . like man-made lightning bolts!’ crowed another. Weeeee! Watch out Iraq, said the American buffoon corps, it’s the e-bomb.

“Reporters certainly believed this copy. As non-embedded journalists moved into Baghdad in the days prior to hostilities, editors contacted military analysts asking for advice on how to e-bomb-proof the electronic tools of the profession. Would cell phones survive? Could a microwave oven be used as an improvised microwave-proof carrier?”

Yes, the invisible e-bombs certainly took care of Iraq.

If DD goes back even further, to the time of the old Crypt Newsletter, we read that home-made or guvmint electromagnetic pulse weapons have always been arriving but never quite appearing. Or they are said to already be here though no one has seen them.

Or because someone has seen them in a computer game or on a TV show like 24 they must exist. Just like the bioweapon that caused rapid onset Alzheimer’s disease in Jack Bauer curable just in time for the next season.

From Crypt News:

A collection of comment and blurt from various EMP weapon kooks was originally [published under the title] “Calling Victor von Doom.”

That piece, from the Crypt Newsletter, cites an original electromagnetic pulse gun story from 1994 in Forbes magazine, one in which hackers are interviewed for their expertise in such things.

The EMP-weapon-used-against-Iraq (this time in the first war) myth was deployed:

“Forbes writer: Have you ever heard of a device that directs magnetic signals at hard disks and can scramble the data?

“Dangerous ex-hackers, in unison: Yes! A HERF [high energy radio frequency] gun.

“Dangerous ex-hacker A: This is my nightmare. $300: a rucksack full of car batteries, a microcapacitor and a directional antenna and I could point it at Oracle . . .

“Dangerous ex-hacker B: We could cook the fourth floor.

“Dangerous ex-hacker A: . . . You could park it in a car and walk away. It’s a $300 poor man’s nuke . . .

“Dangerous ex-hacker A, on a roll: They were talking about giving these guns to border patrol guards so they can zap Mexican cars as they drive across the border and fry their fuel injection . . .

“Dangerous ex-hacker A, really piling it on: There are only three or four people who know how to build them, and they’re really tight lipped . . . We used these in the Persian Gulf. We cooked the radar installation.

“In other parts of the article the “dangerous ex-hackers” discuss the ease of building what purports to be a $300 death ray out of Radio Shack parts and car batteries. In a rare moment of intellectual honesty and self-scrutiny the ‘dangerous ex-hackers’ admit there are a lot of ‘snake oil salesmen’ in the computer security business.”

Cult of Cyberwar: For the benefit of one

Posted in Cyberterrorism, Extremism at 11:04 am by George Smith


Richard Clarke’s publicity campaign bulldozes the media. Note Google ads for Raytheon and Northrop Grumman cybersecurity business operations tied to it.

From the WaTimes:

A cyber-attack could disable trains, Mr. Clarke says. “It could blow up pipelines … [or] damage electrical power grids. … It could confuse financial records, so that we would not know who owned what.”

From the New York Times in 1999, as sampled by me ten years ago:

“US Monitors Millennium Trouble Spots Around the World” was the title of a Tim Weiner penned piece in the New York Times.

“From now until after the New Year’s holiday, hundreds of FBI agents will be monitoring cyberspace for warnings, like ancients searching the skies for a sign, looking out for electronic assaults by hackers and tracking political extremists by computer.

“Civilian and military officials across the country, worried about an organized attempt to take down government computers, are watching everything from reservoirs to the Federal Reserve.

——

” . . . Richard A. Clarke of the National Security Council, repeatedly warns them that ‘cyberterrorists’ could launch computer attacks ‘shutting down a city’s electricity, shutting down 911 systems, shutting down telephone networks and transportation systems,’ as he said in a recent interview.”

From the Washington Times, in November of 1999, on someone else — not Richard Clarke, peddling a book on cyberwar:

“China could launch a devastating computer-run sabotage operation by attacking U.S. oil refineries, many of which are grouped closely together in areas of Texas, New Jersey and California.”

“A [Chinese] computer attacker could penetrate the electronic ‘gate’ that controls refinery operations and cause fires or toxic chemical spills . . . “

However, in November of 1999, from Richard Clarke, as reported by the Associated Press:

“We could wake one morning and find a city, or a sector of the country, or the whole country have an electric power problem, a transportation problem or a telecommunication problem because there was a surprise attack using information warfare.”

“Clarke compared the reliance [on computer networks] to former drug addicts enrolled in a recovery program,” read the AP article.

“We need to take a lesson from that — at least they know they have a dependency problem. Many of you are still in denial.”

From the Los Angeles Times, in October of 1999:

Richard Clarke: “An enemy could systematically disrupt banking, transportation, utilities, finance, government functions and defense.”

And the granddaddy of all Richard Clarke cyberwar placemat stories — Signal magazine’s “Hidden Hazards Menace U.S. Information Infrastructure,” from August of 1999:

“The greatest threat to U.S. security may come from internal software or hardware trapdoors lying dormant in the nation’s critical infrastructure. The digital equivalent of Cold War moles, these hidden threats would serve as access points for criminals, terrorists or hostile governments to extort money, impel foreign policy appeasement or ultimately launch crippling information attacks on the United States,” stated Signal.

There is “a very real possibility of an electronic Pearl Harbor,” said Clarke to the magazine.

“Without computer-controlled networks, there is no water coming out of your tap; there is no electricity lighting your room; there is no food being transported to your grocery store; there is no money coming out of your bank; there is no 911 system responding to emergencies; and there is no Army, Navy and Air Force defending the country . . . All of these functions, and many more, now can only happen if networks are secure and functional.

“A systematic [attack] could come from a terrorist group, a criminal cartel or a foreign nation . . . and we do know of foreign nations that are interested in our information infrastructure and are developing offensive capabilities that would allow them to take down sectors of our information infrastructure.”

For Signal, Clarke claimed “trapdoors” unspecified and theoretical, “some of which may already be in place, as the greatest potential threat to the information infrastructure. Residing in the operating systems of key networks that support the U.S. critical infrastructure, these trapdoors would provide windows of opportunity for any ill-intentioned adversary to wreak considerable havoc. ‘It is at least theoretically possible that a nation could insert such trapdoors, and then make demands of the United States under threat to our infrastructure.'”

The cyberwar scenario was delivered:

“One possible scenario would feature a demand leveled by a foreign government or terrorist group. When the U.S. government refuses to comply, this adversary demonstrates its capabilities by reducing a region of the United States to chaos. ‘I think the capability to do that probably exists in the hands of several nations,’ Clarke stated. ‘I think it could exist in the near future in the hands of criminal and terrorist organizations.'”

—-

“Envision all of these things happening simultaneously -electricity going out in several major cities; telephones failing in some regions; 911 service being down in several metropolitan areas. If all of that were to happen simultaneously, it could create a great deal of disruption, hurt the economy . . . “

Sources in a longer piece here.

Citations from Google News tab today including “Richard Clarke,” “Cyberwar” and the turning off of the electricity: at least 10

From non-cybersecurity expert, Michi Kakutani, in the New York Times this week:

Blackouts hit New York, Los Angeles, Washington and more than 100 other American cities. Subways crash. Trains derail. Airplanes fall from the sky.

Gas pipelines explode. Chemical plants release clouds of toxic chlorine. Banks lose all their data. Weather and communication satellites spin out of their orbits. And the Pentagon’s classified networks grind to a halt, blinding the greatest military power in the world.

The only things left out: The sky turning the color of sack cloth and cats and dogs fornicating in the street.

« Previous Page « Previous Page Next entries »