09.13.14
The MRAP, big hardware for the culture of fear
Chagrined over having to get rid of it.
Today the New York Times ran a story that’s been floating around California for a couple weeks, fallout from the Ferguson riots and the national discussion on he arrival of heavy armored cars on American streets.
The city of Davis was perhaps not the best place to shove an MRAP into, it being the town where a peaceful student protest was painfully put down in now famous imagery of security blithely hosing down young people with pepper spray.
The police department of this modest college town is among the latest California beneficiaries of surplus military equipment: a $700,000 armored car that is the “perfect vehicle,??? the police chief told the City Council, “to perform rescues of victims and potential victims during active shooter incidents??? …
But the City Council directed [Chief Landy Black] last month to get rid of it in the face of an uproar that had swept through this community, with many invoking the use of similar equipment by the police against protesters in Ferguson, Mo., after the fatal shooting of Michael Brown, an unarmed black teenager.
“This thing has a turret — it’s the kind of thing that is used in Afghanistan and Iraq,??? said Dan Wolk, the mayor. “Our community is the kind of community that is not going to take well to having this kind of vehicle. We are not a crime-ridden city.???
Kudos for having the fortitude to make an emphatic stand and statement.
While some police in very large metropolitan police departments can make a case, not necessarily always a good one, about the need for what is a heavy armored fighting vehicle, most of the burgs, which is where many of them are now, can’t.
The country’s medium-sized and small towns do not need combat-tested armor nor are they likely to. Mines and artillery barrages are not coming to this country and the number of deployed MRAPs now far outweighs, out guns and out numbers the potential for terrorism or the need to be ready to put down insurrection with overwhelming force.
Fear is what has driven the spread of the MRAP. The theology is that there is always the potential for some terrible criminal or terrorist assault somewhere in America and that these are the things, along with many others, that must be around to guarantee the safety of the police and the public. It is a nationwide view that feeds itself. Under this logic there can never be an end to the acquisition and stockpiling of weapons.
This well done video, with a point — When Did Americans Become the Enemy — nicely shows the ridiculous (and really now kind of oppressive) nature of the Department of Defense’s giveaways to small town America.
The New York Times includes the argument made by in Los Angeles about the infamous North Hollywood shootout of 1997. Now seventeen years past, two bank-robbers armed with fully automatic assault rifles and kitted in bullet-resistant clothing, engaged the police in a firefight that was carried on television.
In the battle, they were killed. Eleven police officers were wounded.
However, the passage of time and history have shown this is an outlier. Not a sign of things to come but that kind of event that may happen once or twice in a lifetime. (For a laugh, re-watch the movie Predator 2. Released in 1990, it is cast in the Los Angeles of 1997, the beginning throwing the movie-viewer into a pitched battle in downtown Los Angeles, one between machine-gun and grenade armed “Colombians” and an, of course, out-gunned police detachment. Even the North Hollywood gun battle that actual year wasn’t as apocalyptic. And since, Predator 2’s Hollywood interpretation of a future LA looks increasingly anachronistic.)
Newly released information from the DoD shows that Los Angeles County police forces field nine Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles.
The Pentagon’s MRAP program was a consequence of the war based on fraud in Iraq. In essence, it was free money to arms manufacturers globally, if they could come up with vehicle impervious to roadside bombs and large buried mines.
The result of the program was a number of only roughly similar vehicles, the commonality being they were all huge, heavy, armored and expensive, ranging in price from around 700,000 to over 900,000 dollars.
Search Google images and you can see the various models like the MaxxPro or the Caiman, the latter coming in four-wheel and six wheel models, optimized for the US Marine Corps but now plainly visible in police departments.
The Davis MRAP is, I think, a MaxxPro. The link above shows the city of Guthrie’s Caiman. The town, population 10,600 or so, is in Logan County, Oklahoma.
These vehicles are a burden on the taxpayers of such towns, one of the reasons the DoD wanted to offload them while still maintaining ownership. It would seem they must be covered by a special kind of insurance and they must be maintained. Can just anyone in small town America maintain a Caiman MRAP? Where do the spare tires come from and what do they cost?
“The Council’s decision set off waves of concern among police officials across the state and highlighted the fact that California — whose crime rate, like those of many other states, is on the decline — has one of the highest concentrations of surplus military equipment in the nation,” writes the Times.
Ultimately, little will be done, except perhaps at the local level as in Davis, about MRAP distribution. Legislation to control or stop police acceptance of such things will die in Congress, as everything does.
And while the President has indicated he supports looking into whether or not DoD gear to police departments ought to be slowed, will not pursue it. The obvious reason, again, is it will immediately be a political millstone. The other side will predictably tell its base that the President, the socialist foreign-born tyrant, is trying to disarm the police.
The presence of the MRAP is not only a product of America’s Culture of Fear. It’s a WhiteManistan thing, too.
Don’t believe it. Look at all the pictures of them in police departments. Note the majority of faces, when shown.
It is within this context that the decision made by the city of Davis is a remarkable one. For various reasons, one mentioned previously,
occasionally other towns have decided they will disengage, too.
Ted Jr. said,
September 14, 2014 at 3:32 pm
Unfortunately, for every ‘success’ story such as this one, there will be 99 other cities or counties which will take these monstrosities for all the aforementioned reasons.
An interesting little side note, in the cauldron of post WW1 Germany, the Weimar government had no hesitation in using armoured cars to break up demonstrations – especially if they were the ‘wrong’ kind.
George Smith said,
September 15, 2014 at 1:08 pm
“Amid a national debate over the militarization of the police, the San Jose Police Department has decided to return a 15-ton armored vehicle it received earlier this year from the military surplus program.
“San Jose police spokeswoman Sgt. Heather Randol told KCBS the decision was made based on concerns for potential damage to the department’s image and community relationships …”
http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2014/08/29/416281-mrap-san-jose-police-returning-armored-transport-amid-militarization-debate-tank-armored-mine-fedeal/
“Last week, the Albuquerque Police Department announced it was getting rid of its massive 45,000-pound Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected vehicle largely due to concerns over criticism about over-militarization.
“But now, APD has disclosed it has already purchased one tactical vehicle and plans on obtaining another …”
It bought an armored bulldozer and a modified Lenco BearCat using the ubiquitous Homeland Security grant. The piece adds the APD has been cited by DoJ for use of excessive force.
http://watchdog.org/163135/albuquerque-mrao-switcheroo/
Davis, by far, has dominated the news on the issue. As said, it’s an exception. Other police departments are going ahead with getting more of them throughout the country.
George Smith said,
September 15, 2014 at 5:09 pm
You can’t satirize the United States. PARIAH fake magazine covers printing the truth were ahead of their time.
Beyond ludicrous, San Diego School District Police Force acquires the 6-wheel Caiman MRAP:
“There will be medical supplies in the vehicle. There will be teddy bears in the vehicle,” [San Diego School Police Chief Ruben Littlejohn] said…
On the KPBS website, a reader questioned the message sent by the school district police with the vehicle.
“They can call it a ‘love buggy,’ a ‘student patrol limo,’ or a ‘campus police fun bus’ and then paint it pretty colors,” a reader wrote, “but that doesn’t change the fact it’s a piece of military equipment that is unnecessary and sends the message that local officials are at war with students.”
Today, San Diego resident Andy Hinds writes about the MRAP in an article for The Daily Beast that asks the question Why Does My Kids’ Elementary School Need a Tank?
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2014/09/13/348242448/san-diego-school-district-s-new-15-ton-armored-vehicle-creates-stir
The Caiman MRAP cost the school district $5000 to transport.
It comes as no surprise, too, that Los Angeles Unified School District also acquired an MRAP in June:
Though the L.A. Daily News reported that the weapons were never used, the 14-ton, mine resistant and ambush proof (MRAP) vehicle that LAUSD received in June was created for fighting insurgents in Iraq. LAUSD Police Chief Steven Zipperman said the MRAP would be helpful in the case of a large-scale attack …
And Del Rey Oaks, population 1,700, in Monterey County has acquired an MRAP…
http://www.montereycountyweekly.com/news/cover/how-del-rey-oaks-police-acquired-a-bomb-resistant-military/article_8c24993c-3946-11e4-b5d1-0017a43b2370.html
If you read all these stories, particularly this one, you notice that many of the vehicles are obtained and presented as a done deal before being presented to the community or any of the local councils.
In fact, it is now obvious that the Pentagon and police departments around the country are very aware of the controversy surrounding acquisition. This seems to have, in turn, motivated the acquisitions to be made without any opportunity for debate.
And here is another breakdown of MRAPs recently acquired in Los Angeles County as well as other places in CA:
The tiny Taft Police Department, which is comprised of 15 full-time officers, patrols a 10-square-mile area populated by 9,000 people. The small police agency, in the Central Valley, has received $2.12 million worth of equipment including an armored mine-resistant ambush-protected vehicle …
The article notes Whittier, Covina and Pasadena. This is Whittier’s second armored car, the first being a smaller Peacekeeper, which I believe I’ve mentioned in connection previously. Because South Pasadena has one.
Covina has used its newly acquired MRAP vehicle four times in the past six months for barricaded suspects and warrants for possibly armed suspects, [a police chief] said.
http://www.sgvtribune.com/government-and-politics/20140913/san-gabriel-valley-cops-make-use-of-former-military-gear
And, Sedgwick County, KS, adds an MRAP:
The maintenance costs are also left for local authorities. About $15,000 went into making this vehicle ready for the Sedgwick County Sheriff’s office, that money went towards painting it and also installing equipment for communication. Officials don’t know how much money it will ultimately have to spend for maintenance, but say they will pay for those costs out of the asset forfeiture fund — money from things seized from criminal cases.
http://ksn.com/2014/08/27/sedgwick-county-adds-a-new-mrap-to-their-arsenal/
anon said,
September 16, 2014 at 3:47 pm
‘…and they never played hooky from school again.”
https://news.vice.com/article/san-diegos-school-district-now-has-a-military-grade-armored-truck?utm_source=vicenewstwitter
George Smith said,
September 17, 2014 at 2:00 pm
You almost feel sorry for the city of Davis’ police chief. The poor man is the only one being made to lose his MRAP while everyone else is working overtime to get more of them. How’d he get so unlucky?