03.01.11
Posted in Ted Nugent at 9:30 am by George Smith
This time at Human Events, Ted Nugent — parrot for the Tea Party, shoeshine boy for the extreme right plutocracy, and the very poor man’s John Galt — goes at it here.
Usually Nugent can reliably be counted upon to hate on Europe, particularly France.
Curiously, in this column, he does not. Europe and France are given backslaps, apparently because Nugent believes they are becoming more intolerant.
And the creeping menace of shariah, polluting precious bodily fluids, also comes into play.
Previously, Nugent has endorsed banning shariah in the US.
Today, the prescription is for Europe:
If Europe really wants to get tough, its countries should outlaw Sharia law in all of its machinations.
And:
The brain-dead politically correct facade of multiculturalism was directed primarily at Muslims, and everyone knows it. European leaders were scared to be labeled as intolerant religious bigots by Muslims. Their fear was misplaced. They should have been vociferously condemning Muslims who wanted to be treated separately.
Perhaps Nugent should invite Frank Gaffney and Jerry Boykin to wild boar hunts on his ranch in Crawford, TX.
Permalink
02.26.11
Posted in Extremism, Ted Nugent at 10:42 am by George Smith
Ted Nugent hates more on the Wisconsin protesters and the state senators who have left for Illinois.
The insults and name-calling range from calling for the hanging of Democrats, to bringing up Chappaquiddick, to insinuating the state politicians are lower than Muammar Gaddafi because at least the dictator is choosing to stay and slaughter people to the end.
Some excerpts:
This juvenile, pro-union stunt has only tightened the political noose for Democrats in 2012. Hang ‘em high.
========
Just as it sank the presidential aspirations of Democratic poster boy Ted Kennedy when he ran away and hid for eight hours or so before reporting to the police that he had driven off a bridge with a female passenger, this stunt is going to bleed Democrats of support
======
No Democrat is going to turn on the labor unions. Al Capone and Jimmy Hoffa live.
=======
Terminally whacked as he is, at least Col. Whackjob Gadhafi has so far vowed to stay and fight to the end in Libya. He hasn’t run away yet from the mob of Libyans looking to lynch him, but maybe he hasn’t been following what is happening in Wisconsin and Indiana.
=========
Americans intrinsically know that running away is a sign of weakness…
Weaklings, cowards, having less stones than a crazy dictator, like Al Capone and to be figuratively hung. Did I miss anything?
Permalink
02.22.11
Posted in Culture of Lickspittle, Extremism, Ted Nugent at 4:58 pm by George Smith
DD is surprised it took Ted Nugent almost a week to begin hating on the Wisconsin teachers. His contempt for unions, particularly those serving the middle class of his old home state, Michigan, is well known. And his loathing of auto-workers is probably one of a few reasons the person once known as the Motor City Madman is now living near Waco, TX.
While he can still fill the occasional theater near Detroit, most of the people in the state no longer have any use for him.
A few minutes ago, from Uncle Ted, at the WaTimes:
So many teachers in Milwaukee have called in sick to protest this widely supported bill that Milwaukee schools have shut down. The teachers should be fired or at least forced to sit in the corner and wear dunce hats and apologize for this juvenile stunt … Wanting their fantasy cake of unaccountability and eating it too, the unions and their ignorant, brainwashed sheep are whining and protesting …
What kind of lowlifes would call in sick when they are not? Look and see.
Previously, I’ve tried to explain the spite of Ted Nugent. Most of it revolves around his disappointing story. His career declined, as so many do, through no fault of his own. So he reinvented himself as a blighted old white man with a bullhorn.
A couple months ago, I described it thusly:
Suggesting churches give up what he implies is loot in gold and silver is an unusually new and surprising low, even for someone like Ted Nugent.
When I started the Ted Nugent tab … I wondered what had shriveled him so much.
Here was a guy who had everything in the Seventies (and for a chunk of the Eighties). And as his career declined he folded like cardboard. Unable to reinvent himself gracefully in old age, he turned into a mouthpiece for the extreme right’s most vicious social policies, nothing more than a convenient gasbag for the Washington Times, or someone good for three minutes on Fox News.
Nugent fled Michigan for Crawford, Texas, starting a column for the Waco Tribune, where he was also run off for being uncharitable and rude.
Those who have read the entries on Nugent in this blog have seen the man in his words, ranting on obscure Internet radio programs and television shows. There he is, the strict law-and-order dude and mighty hunter, complaining bitterly and vituperatively over trivial troubles that were entirely his own doing in California. Opining that he’s been victimized by various conspiracies.
What motivates Ted Nugent is vindictiveness … He never recovered from losing his place at the top of the heap, a process all rock stars must inevitably go through. Many handle it with struggle and embarrassment. Others deal with it quietly and gracefully. A few die from it.
However, Ted Nugent decided he’d take it out on the values of the people who put him in the arenas during the high tide of classic rock. And he lost even more, gaining only a reputation as a panderer for people with fortunes which make his place in life look very small.
.
Here are some Ted quotes, amazingly published for Labor Day:
Unionized public employees with their sweetheart deals at taxpayer expense are one significant reason why some cities and states are in such dire financial condition.
Unionized public employees have better deals than the taxpayers who are funding them. Federal employees make twice as much as their private-sector peers. This is all beyond bizarro.
===
Unionized public employees with their sweetheart deals at taxpayer expense are one significant reason why some cities and states are in such dire financial condition.
And here’s some standard Ted contempt for auto-workers:
Taxpayers should not be held accountable to bailout the automobile industry or any other industry for that matter. There is constitutional authority for the decades of poor management decisions, forecasting and labor deals that have put GM, the U.S.’s largest automobile maker, perilously close to going belly up.
======
While the [United Auto Workers] may believe GM, Ford and Chrysler are in business to provide automotive workers a salary and other costly benefits, the reality is that car companies are in business to make a profit. Period. Write that down.
The UAW’s costly benefit demands over the years coupled with weak automotive management who historically caved into the UAW’s demands put the automotive bolts, so to speak, to the shareholders and, to a certain degree, has put the Big Three on the path to possible extinction.
====
Bailing out GM with billions of taxpayer dollars is the wrong approach. GM is not too big to fail. What GM may be is too unprofitable to stay in business.
Have you gotten the idea that Ted’s pretty much a lost cause in Michigan?
It is not just the middle class Nugent despises. There’s literally no one (or nothing) too small or weak for him to hate on.
Here Nugent goes after cats. Seriously.
Predictably, here he attacks Social Security.
Here Nugent hates on some old lady whose methods, he says, are used to attack him. Really.
And here’s Ted as an MC for Don Blankenship, Coalstock and Massey Energy. A few months later all those men died in a Massey mine and Blankenship became one of the most vilified corporate figures in the country.
It’s impossible to exaggerate the wild mean spirit of Ted Nugent since he limns it so well all by himself.
Permalink
01.26.11
Posted in Rock 'n' Roll, Ted Nugent at 10:13 am by George Smith
Good news, lads! Good news! I heard Ted just landed the role of ‘Howard’ in the remake of The Treasure of the Sierra Madre.
Based upon Ted’s well known misadventure with a chainsaw , DD provides for your entertainment this Yankovic-ization of Cat Scratch Fever — Chainsaw Rally.
“It bit in my foot with a stroke of my hand …”
Intro copped from FZ and the Mothers of Invention.
Keywords: Ted Nugent, Love is Like a Chainsaw
Permalink
01.25.11
Posted in Extremism, Ted Nugent at 8:30 am by George Smith
Today’s Nugent is hard to untangle. Other than the virulent opposition to Obamacare, Nugent constructs the argument that it must be aborted because it doesn’t abort abortion.
Buried within it is the conspiracy theory that government coverage of abortion is a strategy to win the votes of liberals and the poor because they allegedly get so many of them.
I was weighing whether or not this is what Nugent really meant. On one hand, it might be just an incidental interpretation — because the copy editor gave up trying to straighten Ted’s prose out.
However, on the other, it’s so inflammatory it’s right in Ted character.
Here’s the heart of it:
The president desperately needs the pro-abortion crowd. He knows they constitute a core base of the Democratic Party, and that he can’t further alienate the extreme left wing who believe in providing shopping carts to the homeless. Even though half of all African-American pregnancies end in abortion, aborted masses of fetal tissue simply doesn’t [sic] matter when there is a re-election campaign to plan. Winning elections at all costs is what really counts.
At their core, liberals have few, if any, moral or ethical principles that matter. They desperately try to spin a good game about so-called reproductive rights, health care, education, crime, illegal immigration, etc., but what liberals really want is more power and control, a principle in line with the commie Three Stooges of Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez and the deceased Che Guevara.
In other news, Nugent is off the hook in South Dakota on whether he hunted without proper licensing as part of a pep rally for a local Tea Party group.
Permalink
01.15.11
Posted in Extremism, Ted Nugent at 12:18 pm by George Smith
The insulting spectacle of Tea Partiers self-validating by claiming common cause with Martin Luther King, Jr. is a regular event. Bizarre and inappropriate, the phenomenon reached its high water mark last year when Glenn Beck tried to cast himself as a modern day MLK.
That sure worked.
Anyway, now you can go on YouTube and easily find video in which miscellaneous Tea Party bigots drape themselves in MLK, just in time for the government-they-despise-so-much-instituted holiday. Like this marginal piece here.
Today, Ted Nugent has written a new WaTimes column celebrating the memory of MLK and going so far as to imagine, from his point of view, what the man might recommend were he alive today.
But Nugent has virtually nothing to say when he isn’t doing his usual shtick.
Since MLK Day remembrance doesn’t afford and opportunity to demonize Democrats or curse the ‘Mao Tse Tung fan club’ said to be in the White House, there’s nothing in the column a high school salutatorian couldn’t come up with.
Here’s the high point, I guess:
The time is always right to do the right thing.
That would seem inarguable.
However, it’s more educating to sample from Ted’s actual daily thoughts from last year. Just to see how they might compare with the spirit of MLK.
And so, from this old DD post, random excerpts from Nugent’s appearance on the Alex Jones radio show on 7-9-10:
“[much deleted] while we crush the bad and the ugly of Barack Hussein Obama and his legions of pimps, whores and welfare brats.”
This, from an extended riff on the conspiracy mania — a joke in and of itself — that the Obama administration was going to take away the right to own guns:
“Sonia Sotomayor, you racist punk …”
“When and if these Mao Tse Tung fan-clubbers in the White House dare
continue down the road they are going and all hell breaks loose, I
am convinced that the majority of law enforcement and the majority
of military personnel will be on the side of we the people …”
After the last inflammatory bit flirting with the subject of armed revolt, Nugent hastily added a bit about going to the voting booth to enact a “turbo-charged awakening” of political change.
Yeah, MLK and Ted Nugent really go good together.
Permalink
01.14.11
Posted in Extremism, Ted Nugent, Uncategorized at 8:49 am by George Smith
UPDATED
I’ve said that when Ted Nugent doesn’t use incivility and the threat of violence in his columns at the WaTimes he has nothing to say. Without these things he’s an empty fellow.
Which made his last column appear as sent in by a sleepwalker. Or mostly ghost-written by a frantic editor.
Nugent knows this. And he’s particularly threatened by any national admonitions to tone it down. After all, calling people names got him tossed off the pages of his old home, the Waco Tribune — a right-wing newspaper.
There, Nugent was told to tone it down. At first he agreed. Then he flipped out. So he was sent packing.
This week’s national appeals to curb the “violent rhetoric” strikes right at Nugent’s only talent outside guitar playing and — well, hunting.
Nugent writes:
I say conservatives should turn up the rhetoric. When honestly identified, the hues and cries from the right are good for America, calls to get America back on track. Only those opposed to such an upgrade would find fault with such rhetoric.
——–
If liberals truly wanted to tone down the rhetoric, they could prove it by stopping the lying. But that won’t happen. Mr. Krugman and other liberals know that if it weren’t for a steady drumbeat of lies and deceit, the Democratic Party would cease to exist.
Let’s be honest. Those on the left don’t want to tone down political rhetoric. They only want to tone down conservative speech to make it more “fair.”
The Democrats are wrong on everything from energy to health care to taxes. What they despise is having their agenda exposed, dissected and ridiculed.
—–
And the conclusion:
In order to defeat liberals on the political-ideology battlefield, conservatives must be clear in purpose and then get after it by targeting (yes, I said targeting) and attacking Democratic nostrums that have weakened America. Expose, isolate and eliminate liberals and their fuzzy-headed policies …
Conservatives have liberals outnumbered and surrounded. Don’t play nice with liberal snakes. Don’t let them escape. Instead, do America a favor and crush liberalism.
Nugent is particularly irked by Paul Krugman, whose twice weekly column and blog must really push his buttons.
Krugman today:
The other side believes that people have a right to keep what they earn, and that taxing them to support others, no matter how needy, amounts to theft. That’s what lies behind the modern right’s fondness for violent rhetoric: many activists on the right really do see taxes and regulation as tyrannical impositions on their liberty.
There’s no middle ground between these views. One side saw health reform, with its subsidized extension of coverage to the uninsured, as fulfilling a moral imperative: wealthy nations, it believed, have an obligation to provide all their citizens with essential care. The other side saw the same reform as a moral outrage, an assault on the right of Americans to spend their money as they choose.
This deep divide in American political morality — for that’s what it amounts to — is a relatively recent development …
As many analysts have noted, the Obama health reform — whose passage was met with vandalism and death threats against members of Congress — was modeled on Republican plans from the 1990s.
But that was then. Today’s G.O.P. sees much of what the modern federal government does as illegitimate; today’s Democratic Party does not … Right now, each side in that debate passionately believes that the other side is wrong. And it’s all right for them to say that. What’s not acceptable is the kind of violence and eliminationist rhetoric encouraging violence that has become all too common these past two years.
Just for good measure, Nugent — again — from early last year at the WaTimes:
November is hunting season. No bag limit.
And weeks later, from a column on how people need more guns to protect themselves from evil and crime and Democrats threaten that so they are in need of stomping like cockroaches:
In the otherwise universally recognized perfection of the American experiment in self-government, where evil monsters like Che Guevara and Mao Zedong are routinely worshipped by the very imbeciles that these historical murderers would have slaughtered unhesitatingly, to a community-organizer-in-chief whose terminal rookie agenda is maniacally to spend our way out of debt and drop charges against clear and present criminal New Black Panther thugs threatening voters in Philadelphia, to black-robed idiots claiming Americans have no right to self-defense, where pimps, whores and welfare brats party hearty with the mindless fantasy that Fedzilla will wipe their butts eternally, ad nauseam – I am compelled to increase my crowbar swinging to new heights every day. I am the steel ballerina. Let’s dance.
It is not good enough simply to spotlight cockroaches: Ultimately, all caring people must always rally to the requisite stomping party. For us varmint hunters, these are truly the good old days of a target-rich environment with no bag limit. Let the stomping increase to a furious frenzy and cacophony of good over evil. May America create the splat heard round the world. My steel-toed boots are giddy with anticipatory delight. Stomp on into a voting booth near you.
Et cetera, from still another:
If a business was run the way our bandit politicians have run our government, the owners of the business would be charged with any number of crimes. The same rules do not apply to the political punks who run our country and genuflect at the altar of inefficiency and graft. We need look no further than the robbing of the Social Security Trust Fund to know that dishonesty is the way of life in DC. I’m surprised Barney Frank hasn’t proposed a tribute for Bernie Madoff.
Notice how the left-wing bureaucrat punks in DC support throwing more good money after bad as the solution to our nation’s health care “crisis”? That’s standard operating procedure for left-wing numbnuts who believe Fedzilla is the answer to every problem in America.
These political robber barons will seemingly support anything that keeps feeding the bloated Fedzilla with our hard-earned tax dollars regardless that our dollars are outrageously wasted and that there is little to no accountability how our dollars are spent. The largest crisis America faces is not health care, the war on terror, or Nancy Pelosi’s crazy rants, but rather the lying, cheating punk politicians in DC who trample on our constitution …
Update addendum:
More of Nugent’s 2010 rant on not enough gun carrying US citizens is worth reprinting. This, coming at a time when there is obviously no gun control in the US. Politically, it has been a third rail, thank to the power of the NRA. And it is only the Loughner massacre in Tucson that makes it now possible to see minor current legislation to curb extended magazines moving forward.
Nugent:
Since the 1960s LSD-inspired goofiness of peace and love, I have always been convinced that the gun-control issue has been the tip of the culture-war spear. Why the peaceniks still deny the truth that more guns equal less crime, in spite of the tsunami of global evidence from every imaginable source, is one of mankind’s greatest mysteries …
More phenomenally stupid is the whole world’s denial of the plethora of statistics proven in John Lott’s book “More Guns, Less Crime,” in which the desirable condition of safer streets and communities with drastically reduced violent crime is accomplished most readily where more citizens not only have access to firearms but actually carry them daily on their persons.
From the ultrasafe streets of Switzerland, where every household has a real, honest-to-God full-auto-assault rifle and ammo on hand (and a proud national respect for their fellow citizens, mind you) to the multitude of jurisdictions across America where more concealed weapons per capita are issued, violent crime not only plummets, but personal-assault crimes such as rape, carjacking and armed robbery actually disappear in many instances.
At this point, everyone knows that one of the heroes at the Tucson massacre was carrying. It didn’t help and it might have ended in even more blood had he used it.
And Nugent is not quite right about Switzerland, in a self-serving way. The reality is more complicated.
From Der Spiegel, three years ago:
It comes as a surprise to many to learn that the peaceful country has one of the highest rates of gun ownership in the world — lagging [only] behind the United States …
Able-bodied men have to serve in the military and are issued with assault rifles or pistols. They are allowed to keep their weapons and 50 rounds of ammunition at home during military service — which generally goes to the age of 30 or even longer — so that the army can be mobilized at short notice. Many men buy their weapons after they finish their military service, and the arms are often stored in unsecured closets, attics or cellars.
The new public mood is largely in response to a series of shootings involving army weapons. In a 2001 incident which sparked nationwide debate, 15 people died when a man opened fire with an army assault rifle in a regional parliament building in the small town of Zug, shooting 14 people and killing himself.
Around 300 people are killed in Switzerland each year in incidents — mostly suicides and family murders — involving army guns. According to a 25-country survey by the British-based non-governmental organization International Action Network on Small Arms, Switzerland’s total number of gun deaths, including accidents, in 2005 was 6.2 per 100,000 people — second only to the US rate of 9.42 per 100,000.
Gun advocacy in the US has rendered it impossible to research gun control law and statistics on the web. As anyone who tries to do it quickly finds out.
The US gun lobby has not only defeated all politicians but, in this matter, has also bested Google and all Internet search.
Note: The New York Times appears to be starting the move to put an unknown part of its content behind a wall. Readers may notice this if they access Paul Krugman’s opinion piece more than once from the same browser. At which point they are faced with a login prompt.
There is a (perhaps) temporary way around this.
It’s tied to your nytimes.com cookie for now. So if you run your browser in a program like Sandboxie, as DD does, you can simply exit when faced with the prompt and delete all contents in the virtual sandbox. That will destroy the cookie and, as far as the New York Times website is concerned, you’ll look like a new reader the next time you access the material.
Probably won’t work forever, though. And if that bit of information was too much to follow, never mind.
Permalink
01.11.11
Posted in Extremism, Ted Nugent at 7:32 pm by George Smith
DD thought Jared Loughner’s massacre would present Ted Nugent with a bit of a problem.
Arizona’s gun laws are obviously the most lax in the country. And other armed civilians were at the massacre. There is no opportunity for Nugent to rant about civilians not being able to carry arms sufficient for personal defense.
And there is no way to make a rational argument defending the right of civilians to have thirty round magazines for their handguns.
So Nugent doesn’t get into his usual thing about the soullessness of those who would restrict gun rights. Even though no gun rights have been restricted by the Obama administration.
Nugent’s advice this time out: Be prepared for evil.
He writes:
Never before has the need for a higher level of awareness and a warrior mindset been more important … Be prepared to stop evil in its tracks and live. There is no other choice.
That’s his message.
Stop evil in its tracks. I think we can agree that’s a good thing to aspire to.
Many would also probably agree that when a Jared Loughner comes to the public event there’s very little even the most alert and warrior-minded among the populace can do until people have suddenly been riddled with gunfire.
Since the massacre has also brought a discussion about violent language forward it should be noted Nugent’s new column contains none of it.
This is in start contrast to Nugent’s usual shtick. His value to his publishers lies only in his regular use of incivility and violent rhetoric. And when Nugent leaves it out of his writings he suddenly has nothing to say.
If you’re a regular DD reader you’ll know how unusual this is for the man.
I’ve made the point that Nugent is the perfect example of the mainstreaming of really unpleasant and mean-spirited extremism, the kind of which was unacceptable in public discourse many years ago.
Now it’s good enough to get you on Anderson Cooper 360.
Nugent’s column, again, is here.
Here’s Ted — and you knew I going to do this — exhorting his readers earlier last year:
November is hunting season. No bag limit.
That column, one among many constantly attacking the US government and various Democratic Party politicians, is here.
From South Dakota:
State wildlife officers have completed an investigation into whether rocker Ted Nugent was eligible to hunt in South Dakota when he shot pheasants on a private preserve near Hot Springs in October.
But they are not saying what they found or what might happen next.
Nugent’s legal status came into question after the Rapid City Journal covered his hunting trip in October. It was later revealed that some of Nugent’s hunting privileges in California had been suspended for an earlier big-game violation there. South Dakota is part of a coalition of 35 states, including California, that honors each other’s license suspensions.
“Nugent was in the area at the time as a featured speaker at a Second Amendment rally sponsored by Citizens for Liberty, a Rapid City area tea party affiliate,” reported the local newspaper.
Permalink
01.07.11
Posted in Extremism, Ted Nugent at 12:28 pm by George Smith
Can you count the number of times superman Ted Nugent uses the word wuss in his new column at the Washington Times?
Can you spot the sodomy joke on what China will do?
An official DD No Prize if you can!
Nugent:
If it weren’t for dependent wusses that the Democratic Party creates and coddles, the party would be extinct …
We’ve all heard about the jobs Americans are not willing to do. Wusses …
Food stamps are for wusses, and the master wussy Democrats have seen to it. It’s easier to be a lazy lump …
Parents should turn off the television, computer games, video games and cell phones. These things make Americans, especially our kids, soft, uninspired, anti-social wusses …
Every kid in America should have at least 10 chores every day …
[Wusses] need to be weeded out and excommunicated. America needs hard-charging warriors, not weak wusses.
Permalink
01.06.11
Posted in Extremism, Ted Nugent at 11:14 am by George Smith
Today the Post ran an op-ed by a Nation contributor, making a joke of the GOP farce called “the reading of the Constitution.” It’s here.
It’s essentially the Ted Nugent’s Rural White America Constitution.
Excerpted:
We, the Real Americans, in order to form a more God-Fearing Union, establish Justice as we see it, Defeat Health-Care Reform, and Preserve and Protect our Property, our Guns and our Right Not to Pay Taxes, do ordain and establish this Conservative Constitution for the United States of Real America.
Congress shall balance the Federal Budget, preferably by eliminating the Departments of Labor, Energy, Education and State.
The preceding provision shall not apply to spending for the Department of Defense, appropriations for which shall increase three times as quickly as the growth in gross domestic product …
2. The right to bear Semi-Automatic Weapons, AK-47s or Bazookas shall not be infringed by background checks, safety locks, age limits or common sense.
3. The right of Corporations, Hedge Funds, Business Leaders and Lobbyists to spend endless cash on campaigns and influence-purchasing shall not be infringed. The so-called right of Unions to associate shall be denied as fundamentally un-American and contrary to the agenda of the Chamber of Commerce.
For Nugent, I’d specifically have substituted “Machine Guns” for “Bazookas” in the 2nd Amendment.
Moving along, CNN’s Anderson Cooper stupidly put him on a panel yesterday.
Roseanne Barr was the only person with the nerve to stand up to his bowdlerized Ayn Rand for outdoorsmen shtick. In the last year you couldn’t find anyone with the stones to do so in the mainstream media.
It’s here.
The salient bits with the standard black-people-in-the-cities-are-parasites and rich-people-make-all-the-jobs bits:
NUGENT: No, you need to try to help people by scolding them to help themselves. If you keep rewarding them for sleeping in then they’ll never get out of slavery. Why would you support slavery?
BARR: I’m scolding you because you’re blaming the people at the bottom who have nothing whatsoever..
NUGENT: I’m blaming people who refuse to be productive.
BARR: Why don’t you blame the people who have the blame? Why aren’t you ever…
NUGENT: Why do you want to [blame] people who have jobs and produce things?
BARR: I want to blame the Koch brothers and the billionaires and all the people who robbed the taxpayers of this country, absolutely.
NUGENT: The government is the one who’s robbed the taxpayers [of] this country.
BARR: What would we do without government? Expect the rich people to take care of the poor? Are you crazy?
NUGENT: The rich people are the ones providing jobs.
BARR: No, they’re not. There are no jobs. There are no jobs and rich people…
NUGENT: Rich people who put all their lives on the line to get creative.
BARR: Rich people don’t pay squat and it’s proven.
Permalink
« Previous Page — « Previous entries « Previous Page · Next Page » Next entries » — Next Page »